5.0 on Google · Trusted by 1,200+ Brands · Custom Clothing Manufacturer · Made in the USA
Two vendor quotes just landed for the same 200 unit polo order, and the numbers are nowhere close. One vendor pushed embroidery, the other pushed screen printing, and neither explained why a logo on the exact same shirt could cost twice as much depending on the method. That gap is exactly what Embroidery vs Screen Printing: Cost Comparison for Bulk Orders comes down to, and the honest answer is that both methods can be the cheaper choice, just for very different reasons and at very different order sizes.
Screen printing is generally cheaper for bulk apparel orders with simple, bold designs, since the setup cost per color spreads thin across a large quantity. Embroidery costs more per unit at any volume but adds a durable, premium finish that justifies the price on polos, caps, and jackets where a printed logo would look out of place.
Screen printing charges a setup fee per color, typically $20 to $40 per screen, before any shirts get printed. That fixed cost barely changes whether the order is 50 units or 500, which means the cost per shirt drops sharply as quantity increases.
Once past the setup cost, ink and labor per shirt stay relatively low, often landing between $2 and $5 per unit for a one to four color design at quantities of 100 or more. This is the main reason screen printing dominates large bulk orders, since the fixed setup cost becomes almost irrelevant once it’s divided across hundreds of shirts.
Even at high volume, each additional color adds another screen and another setup fee to the total order. A five color design costs meaningfully more to set up than a one color design, though that gap still shrinks as a percentage of total cost the larger the order gets.
Screens can be reused for future reorders as long as the same design and quantity of colors stays unchanged, which means a second order of the same shirt skips the setup fee entirely. This makes screen printing especially cost effective for programs reordering the same uniform design multiple times a year, since only ink and labor apply after the first run.
Most shops apply price breaks at set quantity thresholds, commonly around 50, 100, 250, and 500 units, where the per shirt price drops another notch as the order crosses each tier. Ordering just enough extra units to clear the next tier sometimes costs less in total than staying just under it, which is worth checking before finalizing a quantity.
Embroidery pricing centers on stitch count rather than color count, since thread changes cost little compared to the machine time each stitch requires. A typical left chest logo runs somewhere between 5,000 and 10,000 stitches, and pricing generally scales with that stitch total rather than with the number of thread colors used.
Unlike screen printing, embroidery doesn’t have a comparable setup cost that shrinks dramatically at volume. A digitizing fee, typically a one time charge of $25 to $75 to convert artwork into a stitch file, applies once and carries forward to future reorders, but the per unit machine and thread cost stays fairly consistent whether the order is 50 units or 500.
Because embroidery is a physical stitching process rather than an ink application, machine time per garment doesn’t shrink the way a screen printing setup cost does. This is the core reason embroidery rarely beats screen printing on pure cost for large bulk orders, even though the digitizing fee itself is a one time expense.
Embroidery requires a stabilizer backing behind the fabric to keep stitches from puckering the material, and thicker or specialty backings for stretch fabrics add a small per unit cost most buyers don’t see itemized separately. This detail rarely changes a quote dramatically, but it’s part of why embroidery pricing doesn’t compress as sharply at volume the way screen printing’s ink cost does.
Most embroidery machines run a limited number of thread heads at once, commonly six to fifteen depending on the equipment, which caps how many colors a single design can realistically use without slowing production. Designs pushing past that practical color limit take longer to stitch and can push per unit pricing higher even though embroidery doesn’t charge per color the way screen printing does.
At small quantities, under roughly 25 to 50 units, the gap between the two methods narrows considerably, since screen printing’s setup cost hasn’t been spread thin enough yet to create a clear cost advantage. Embroidery’s stitch based pricing stays more predictable at this range and sometimes comes out close to or even below screen printing depending on design complexity.
Past 100 units, screen printing typically pulls ahead by a wide margin for simple designs, often running $3 to $6 cheaper per unit than a comparable embroidered logo at the same quantity. That gap widens further as order size grows into the hundreds, since screen printing’s fixed costs keep shrinking as a percentage of the total while embroidery’s per unit cost holds steady.
Cost per unit isn’t the only number that matters. Embroidery holds up significantly longer than screen printing on garments that see heavy wear or frequent washing, which means a higher upfront cost can translate to a lower cost over the item’s full lifespan, particularly on polos, caps, and outerwear worn for years rather than a single event.
Orders under roughly 25 units often land close in total cost between the two methods, since screen printing hasn’t spread its setup fee thin enough yet to pull ahead. A one color design at 20 units, for example, might cost nearly the same whether it’s printed or embroidered, making garment type and durability the better deciding factor at that scale rather than price alone.
The savings gap keeps widening well past the 100 unit mark, since screen printing’s fixed setup cost becomes an increasingly small fraction of the total order. At 500 units, the per shirt cost difference between the two methods often exceeds what it was at 100 units, making screen printing’s advantage most pronounced on the largest bulk runs.
Screen printing works best on flat, wide surfaces like the front or back of a t-shirt, where a bold design has room to sit clearly on the fabric. It struggles on textured or curved surfaces like a cap’s front panel or a jacket’s ribbed cuff, where embroidery’s raised stitching adapts far more naturally.
Embroidery is the standard choice for polos, caps, and jackets specifically because those garments are often structured or curved in ways that make screen printing look uneven or difficult to apply cleanly. A logo that’s fine printed on a flat t-shirt can look sloppy stitched onto the same curved cap panel without adjusting the design for embroidery’s format.
Screen printing handles gradients, fine text, and photo style detail more easily than embroidery, since ink can reproduce far finer detail than thread and needle can physically stitch. Embroidery works best with bold, simplified logos and lettering above roughly a quarter inch in height, since smaller text tends to blur together once stitched at that scale.
Lightweight or highly stretchy fabrics, like performance athletic shirts, can pucker under the tension of embroidery stitching unless a proper stabilizer backing is used, which adds a small production step screen printing doesn’t require. Screen printing generally handles stretch fabric more predictably, though it needs the fabric to lie flat during the print and cure process.
Some bulk orders use embroidery for structured items like polos and caps while using screen printing for flat garments like t-shirts within the same branding program. This split approach lets each method handle the garment types it performs best on rather than forcing one technique across every item in a mixed apparel order.
Embroidery is significantly more durable than screen printing over the long term, since stitched thread doesn’t crack, peel, or fade the way surface applied ink can. A well embroidered logo can last the entire lifespan of a garment, often outlasting the fabric itself on heavy use items like caps and jackets.
Screen printing holds up well too, typically surviving 50 or more wash cycles when properly cured, but it remains a surface layer that can eventually crack or fade with enough repeated washing and drying. For programs prioritizing longevity over upfront cost, especially on uniforms worn daily for years, embroidery’s added durability often justifies the higher per unit price.
Screen printing generally turns around faster for large bulk orders once screens are prepared, since a production run can process hundreds of shirts per hour on a properly set up press. Embroidery runs slower per unit since each garment requires individual machine stitching time proportional to the stitch count.
For time sensitive bulk orders in the hundreds of units, screen printing’s faster per unit production speed can matter as much as the cost difference, particularly when a deadline leaves little room for the longer machine time embroidery requires at scale.
| Feature | Screen Printing | Embroidery |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Cost | $20 to $40 per screen color | $25 to $75 one time digitizing fee |
| Cost per Unit at 100+ | $2 to $5 | $5 to $11, based on stitch count |
| Cost Scaling | Drops sharply with volume | Stays fairly consistent per unit |
| Wash Durability | 50+ wash cycles | Lifespan of the garment |
| Best Garment Type | Flat, wide surfaces like t-shirts | Polos, caps, jackets, curved surfaces |
| Design Detail | Handles gradients and fine detail | Best with bold, simplified logos |
Order size, garment type, and how long the item needs to last should drive this decision more than upfront price alone. Large orders of flat garments with simple designs almost always favor screen printing on cost, while polos, caps, and jackets favor embroidery regardless of order size due to fit and durability. Bulk polyester runs built around a full garment design, such as all-over sportswear, sometimes point toward a third option like sublimation instead of either method.
MFG Merch offers embroidery alongside screen printing and sublimation printing for polyester and all-over designs, so we can match the right method to your garment type and order size. Talk to our team about your quantity and design, and we’ll put together a cost comparison specific to your order before you commit.
Screen printing typically pulls ahead past roughly 50 to 100 units for simple, one to four color designs, since the fixed setup cost spreads thin enough to undercut embroidery’s stitch based pricing. Below that range, the cost gap narrows considerably and sometimes favors embroidery depending on design complexity.
Embroidery pricing is tied to machine stitching time per garment, which doesn’t shrink the way a screen printing setup cost does as order size grows. Each garment still requires the same stitch count and machine time regardless of how many units are in the total order.
For uniforms worn daily over years, embroidery’s added durability often justifies the higher upfront cost, since a well embroidered logo can outlast the garment itself. Programs prioritizing lowest possible cost over long term durability tend to choose screen printing instead, particularly for event shirts or short term use apparel.
Yes, and vendors handling both methods in house can usually run a mixed order through one production schedule instead of splitting it across two separate print shops. This keeps turnaround consistent and avoids the shipping delays that come with coordinating two vendors for one branding program.
Not significantly. Embroidery pricing is driven primarily by stitch count, so adding more thread colors to a design costs relatively little compared to screen printing, where each additional color requires an entirely new screen and setup fee.
No. 2,666 with 121% Three-Year Revenue Growth MFG Merch has been named to the 2026 Inc. 5000, ranking No. 2,666 among America’s fastest-growing private
Artwork is finalized, a garment is selected, and a buyer is waiting for approval. The question isn’t whether to show something before production. It’s
A quote is on the table, the per-unit cost looks fine, and then there’s a line item for a set-up fee that nobody explained.
